Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Streaming. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Streaming. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 02 Mei 2014

watch free films online Streaming Miramax Movies To U.S. Viewers


AOL is getting into the full-length movie business with a new ‘Movies’ section for the AOL On Network (disclosure: AOL owns TechCrunch). The company’s movie portal is adding titles from Miramax starting April 30, including what the company says will be “tens of films,” with the selection refreshing on a monthly basis. It’s a move into territory that could put AOL in more direct competition with services like Netflix, but on an ad-supported rather than subscription-based model.
AOL is basically trying to spread its bets with its video portal, with video clips ranging in length from just a few seconds now to feature-length multi-hour movies. It has original content in the works, and is also in talks with other studios beyond Miramax to further stock the new “Movies” section with additional content.
Video is a key initiative in terms of AOL’s plans for future growth, and recent reports suggest that cable operators genuinely have something to fear from portals like YouTube and AOL (which places third in terms of ranked online video content properties by unique traffic, according to comScore’s latest numbers). We’ll likely see more studios embrace ad-supported online models like that offered by AOL On, especially as their consumer reach expands through presence on devices like the Xbox One, PS4, Roku and Amazon Fire TV streaming platforms.

Don’t forget to leave your feedback under and observe us on Twitter or grow to be our Facebook fan for all the most recent updates!



Writted by: totor

Senin, 28 April 2014

Beats Music Gets In-App Subscriptions, Beefs Up Free Streaming Options

Beats Music, the streaming radio solution spun out from the makers of Beats audio hardware products, has decided to bite the bullet and give Apple its 30 percent cut on subscription sign-ups. The streaming music provider originally side-stepped Apple’s in-app ecommerce options in favor of carrier billing arranged outside the app to pay for its full service, but now users can sign up much more easily in the app itself.

The free service included in Beats Music called ‘The Sentence,’ which randomly shuffles music, is much-improved too, with thousands of new songs available in the mix. Monthly subscriptions, which include to on-demand playback of any of the music in the Beats catalog, can now be unlocked via a $9.99 in-app purchase.

Beats allowing the in-app subscription option means that the service likely wasn’t happy with the volume of subscribers it was getting through the old methods. An in-app option is definitely far more convenient for the average user, but it comes with a significant cost to Beats, who have to pay up around $3 to Apple on each new user they sign up for the privilege of using the App Store as the means of distribution. Still, if it leads to a significant increase in the volume of new sign up, it’s probably worth it.

Other new features include a new section that allows artists to push their own music and merchandise, and improved social and offline playback features.

Minggu, 20 April 2014

Deezer lifts music streaming cap; Galaxy S5 users get premium access

deezer-unlimited-music-streaming-premium-access-galaxy-s5-users-0211

Taking its cue from competitors like Spotify and Rdio, startup company Deezer has made its music streaming services available for free to everyone, regardless of subscription plan.

The lifting of restrictions comes after nearly three years of imposing a listening limit for free users. Before, users were allowed up to only 10 hours of free access. Now, Deezer users can listen to and stream music without limit, but this privilege comes at a price: you will be hearing audio ads from time to time.

If you want to give Deezer a try, you can get it from the Google Play Store.

Six-month premium trial period

The company also partnered with Samsung Europe to provide 6 months of premium Deezer access for free to new owners of the Samsung Galaxy S5.

Deezer is also offering a 15-day trial to let you experience the full features of the service. Once you setup a new Deezer account on your Android device, you also instantly activate your 15-day free Premium+ access to Deezer, which grants you ad-free access both on your mobile devices and on the Web.

Ads will begin appearing only after the trial period, unless you opt to continue your Premium+ subscription for a monthly fee of EUR 9.99 (about US$13.88).

deezer-screenshot-flow

Added features

In addition to unlimited access for everyone, Deezer also announced new “smart” features generally meant to personalize the user’s music experience across devices. One such feature is Flow, which takes a look at your music library and your past streams, and, based on those, suggests music for you to try next.

Another “smart” feature is Playlist Radio, which lets you get help from Deezer Editors in creating playlists. Another feature is Artist Radio, which lets you listen smartly and without limits to music from your artist of choice.

deezer-screenshot-radio

Other updates to Deezer include improved advanced search, new music genres, and music discovery/exploration based on geographic region.

The company also launched the beta version of Deezer for Mac, which enables Mac users to merge their music with their Deezer libaries, thus allowing the music to be accessible on mobile devices, tablets, and desktops.

Do you use Deezer? Do you think that it has enough potential to sit beside — or even lord it over — other music streaming titans like Spotify?

Sabtu, 19 April 2014

Aereo TV streaming service adding Chromecast support, starting May 29th

 aereo-devices

Aereo has received quite of attention thanks to its subscription-based model that essentially brings its users over-the-air-TV directly to the web, alongside added DVR functionality. Not all of the attention has been the good kind, though. As we speak Aereo is caught up in a legal battle to determine whether or not the service is actually legal, but Aereo isn’t letting that slow them down.

Today Aereo announced that it will be updating its Android app come May 29th, bringing Chromecast support to the mix! What this means is that you won’t just be able to watch Aereo content through your PC and Android devices, you’ll be able to stream it right back to the big screen as well.

This is a very welcome move for Chromecast users looking to cut the cord without having to revert to bunny ears, though it’s still important to note that Aereo’s service is in beta and is only available in select cities. For more details on Aereo’s plans for Chromecast or for a list of cities where its service is offered, you’ll want to head over to Aereo’s website.

How about it, anyone planning on jumping on Aereo’s $8 monthly service now that it is heading to the Chromecast? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Kamis, 17 April 2014

Netflix 4K streaming inches towards public release but will we be able to watch it?

netflix logoJennypdx

This week, HDTVtest found that Netflix’s 4K streaming appears to be live and operational but only to those with compatible ultra high-definition TV’s. Since the end of 2013, Netflix has stated that the company’s goal was to stream content in the 4K format by the end of 2014.

In the last year, Netflix has started offering Super HD and 3D streams if your ISP has signed up for the company’s new content delivery network. These Super HD streams need 5-7 Mbps of bandwidth while 3D streams need 6-12 Mbps of bandwidth. Netflix has previously stated that 15 Mbps will likely be the minimum needed for the format, though you’ll likely be happier with speeds of around 50 Mbps.

The reviews of the 4K streaming are positive:

“Every time the video stream switched from [1080p HD] to [2160 HD], it’s as if a veil had been lifted from the front of the screen, bringing objects – even faraway ones in long shots – into breathtaking clarity.

Whether the improvement is visible from normal viewing distances remains debatable, however there’s no denying that House of Cards S2 in 4K Ultra HD was by far and away the best-looking title we’ve seen among Netflix’s catalogue of movies and television series, making the company’s previous highest-quality [Super HD] streams seem blurry in comparison.”

Other issues with Netflix’s 4K streaming include ABC/Disney having no interest in 4K streaming and Gizmodo pointing out that binge watching a season of House of Cards in 4K will slam someone’s data usage to the tune of 75GB’s. For many on DSL connections, that puts them right up to their data cap limits while non-DSL users will see their data use rise tremendously and therefore put them closer to their caps. For example, with Comcast expanding their usage-cap trials of 300GB’s, it is not hard to see families running quite close to their data caps.

Add those issues onto the fact that someone will need a 4K display with a built-in HEVC decoder, an updated Netflix client TV, a sufficiently fast broadband speed package with high to no data caps, and an area in which Netflix has enabled 4K streaming, it is not that difficult to conclude that this product is still far away from general public use.

Sabtu, 12 April 2014

Streaming Stick Faceoff: Roku vs. Chromecast

Streaming Stick Faceoff: Roku vs. ChromecastS

Google's Chromecast made waves when it offered a home entertainment solution for $35, letting you stream all sorts of content to a tiny little HDMI-capable stick. Roku decided to take it head on with a stick of its own. Which one is better? We decided to take a head on look.

We've had our hands on a Chromecast for awhile, and though initial abilities weren't all that impressive it has since evolved into a pretty capable little device—so long as you have a phone or tablet to control it. Roku just started shipping their streaming stick for only $15 more, including the full Roku platform without the need for separate device. Each option has its own set of pros and cons, but this shootout intends to find a winner. Let's take at which device is worth the money.

Both Are Equally Portable

If you want to know if one might travel better than the other, don't. Both the Roku and the Chromecast are equally tiny with USB power connectors. While the Chromecast has a bulge at its base and the Roku doesn't, that tiny bit of extra mass doesn't really make a difference when you're tossing either one in a bag. Either device will serve you equally well for travel purposes.

Chromecast Streams More Stuff from Your Mobile Devices

Since all Chromecast does is stream content from mobile devices and computers, it shouldn't come as a surprise that it handles these tasks better and offers more choices. For starters, that includes your web browser, your phone's screen, podcasts, photos, music, and even content from Plex. Thanks to AllCast, you can also streaming any DLNA-capable media with ease (though Roku can, too).

Roku can only stream photos, videos, and apps using its own app and content from Netflix and YouTube. It makes up for these limitations with apps—something we'll get to in a moment—but if you prefer streaming from a device in your hand then the Chromecast covers far more ground.

Roku Offers Actual Apps

While you can download Chromecast-capable apps to stream content from your mobile to your device, you can download actual apps onto your Roku just like the full-sized set top boxes. This includes several content music and video channels, the full home media center app Plex, and even a small selection of casual games. Because these all exist on the device, they're ready to go once you start using the streaming stick. With Chromecast, you have to pull something up on your phone to get started.

Chromecast Is a Better Group Device

Chromecast accepts streams from mobile devices and laptops on your local network. That means if you want to share a YouTube video and have a friend share one afterwards, it's simply a matter of taking turns (so long as you're all sharing the same Wi-Fi). This is great for sharing media together, if that's something you want to do. While you can technically sync up several devices to contribute content to your Roku, their streaming stick wasn't really made for group activities.

Roku Offers More Methods of Control

Chromecast requires another device to provide it with content. Roku can use a mobile device, but it also includes a standard remote control. This gives you the option of controlling the device the way you like. If you like the feel of a physical controller with buttons, this is a big deal and easily worth the extra $15 to get the Roku. If you prefer controlling things from your smartphone, it's not.

Roku Offers Dual-Band Wi-Fi

While the tiny antennae in these streaming sticks might make it a moot point, technically the Roku offers greater Wi-Fi capabilities than the Chromecast. This is solely a result of dual-band. Both streaming sticks support 802.11n, but the Roku can use both the 2.4 and 5.0 GHz spectrums, while the Chromecast is limited to the former.

Chromecast Can Stream Anything via Google Chrome

While Roku has a lot of channels, it doesn't have everything. If there isn't an app for the content you want, you're out of luck. If Chromecast doesn't have an app capable of streaming the content you desire, you can fill in the gaps by streaming from Chrome. Using the Google Cast extension, you can mirror any browser tab on your television screen. As great as this sounds, it's far from perfect. The quality isn't phenomenal and there's a bit of lag. That said, it's far better than nothing at all.


There you have it. While both are capable devices and worth their respective price tags, I personally liked the Roku a bit better—it offers a bit more out of the box for an extra $15. You get apps on the device, a remote, more content choices, and pretty much all the streaming capabilities you'd want in a tiny little package. Most importantly, however, you get choice. If you like remotes, you get a remote. If you like controlling with your smartphone, you can use that instead. The Chromecast costs a bit less, though, and if you like streaming stuff from your mobile device, it might be the ideal choice for you instead.

RelatedRelated
The Best Chromecast Apps

Around a month ago, Google finally released the Chromecast SDK. What this meant for us is that shiny new Chromecast apps would be coming down the… Read…



View the Original article

Selasa, 25 Maret 2014

Some Thoughts On The Latest Apple-Comcast Streaming TV Talks

The Internet is abuzz tonight with a report from the Wall Street Journal that Apple and Comcast have been talking about a streaming, over-the-top video service. Reportedly, those streams would be delivered as a managed service over Comcast’s network, solving the so-called last-mile problem while also ensuring a high quality of service.

I have no special knowledge of these talks in particular, and my contacts at Comcast have declined to comment. But I’ve been following the online video ecosystem for longer than I care to remember, so these are just my initial thoughts on what’s discussed in the report:

On The Introduction Of A New Managed Streaming Service

Much of the report is centered around how the video streams would be delivered to consumers. On that front, the talks center around delivery that is separated from the public Internet but travel instead over Comcast’s private network.

Over the years, Comcast has invested heavily in its own content delivery network, which it uses to deliver streaming videos to a growing number of mobile and connected TV apps. The plan is to also use that network to deliver on-demand (and eventually) live streams to its own set-top boxes.

Already, Comcast has introduced a managed service for streaming videos that it delivers through its streaming Xbox Live app. That means that those streams don’t travel over the broader Internet, but to work they require a subscriber to be a Comcast broadband subscriber as well as a TV subscriber.

All of which is to say, the type of deal that Apple and Comcast are talking about isn’t without precedent. And a whole lot of how it is delivered will be dependent on who exactly owns the customer relationship and what the service entails.

On Content Rights And Customer Control

This is where the WSJ report gets a little iffy, but most of whether or not a deal gets done will depend on the details. The devil is in the details. And the report acknowledges that Comcast and Apple aren’t exactly “close to an agreement.”

On the one hand, Apple wants to create a service in which users would log on with their Apple IDs and control customer data. It would also ask for a cut of the subscription cost, according to the report. Meanwhile, Comcast would want to “retain significant control over the relationship with customers and the data.”

It’s difficult to imagine a world in which Comcast would give up its network and control of customers that are streaming data through such a service.

Then there’s the part about content rights. The report claims that Apple would need to acquire content rights, but that Comcast “would want to ensure that the price Apple has to pay to acquire rights wouldn’t cause the service to be priced higher than traditional pay-TV service,” according to one person.

If customer data seems like a sticking point, content rights seem like an even tougher hurdle to overcome. After all, there’s been no shortage of tech companies seeking TV content rights… and failing.

Over the years Intel, Microsoft, Sony, and yes, even Apple, have all tried to strike deals to roll out their own over-the-top TV services. To date, none has been successful in getting all the deals they need, although last year Sony reached a deal with Viacom for such a service.

For Apple to quickly strike the deals it needs for its own service and also come in with a price that’s lower than existing pay TV services seems like a long shot.

Apple TV And The X1

Comcast has been working to build its own next-generation set-top boxes to replace the old and busted DVRs most customers have today. By relying on the cloud and IP distribution, these set-top boxes are designed to go beyond what most customers have come to expect.

That said, there are still costs associated with rolling out set-top boxes and DVRs to customers. With a growing number of mobile devices out there, as well as Internet-connected TVs, cable companies like Comcast are developing apps to bypass those devices and allowing customers to connect through devices they buy themselves. The next Apple TV, like the Microsoft Xbox, could give Comcast another way to connect to consumers.

So What’s It All Mean?

For all of the above reasons, I think it’s doubtful Apple would roll out its own TV service or license content to create a streaming TV service. To roll out a Comcast app on the next-generation Apple TV box seems a lot more likely. And to make those Comcast streams a managed service on that box in the same way that they’re a managed service on Xbox seems like a no-brainer.