Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Reveal. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Reveal. Tampilkan semua postingan

Jumat, 02 Mei 2014

samsung galaksi s5 Galaxy designs with 2K displays and a newExynos SoC

The build up to a flagship handset’s launch is always filled with various rumors, leaks, and speculations about hardware, and this year’s Samsung Galaxy S5 was certainly no exception. Although all the speculation regarding 2K (2560×1440) displays, the 64-bit octa-core CPU, or a premium version of the handset never amounted to anything, it seems that many of these rumors were based on ideas that Samsung is in the process of testing out.
After doing a little digging, Sammobile has uncovered details on a variety of Samsung Galaxy S5 prototypes, ranging from a handset with a QHD display, all the way to one with a new Exynos SoC complete with an LTE modem developed by Intel.

Samsung definitely has QHD displays

I’ll try to avoid the slightly confusing naming conventions, but if you want to check out the source you’ll need to note that, internally, the Galaxy S5’s prototype was known as the Samsung “K” or G900. The 3G version of which (the k3g) was initially designed with a 5.2 inch QHD AMOLED display in mind, as was one of the initial designs for the Snapdragon powered LTE version of the handset. These designs were eventually scrapped in favour of the 1080p version that ended up in the final product.
This explains why there were so many rumors regarding the Galaxy S5’s display, but also leaves the door wide open for a QHD display from Samsung in a future device, hopefully the Note 4.

Exynos 5430, QHD, and Intel LTE, is this the Premium Galaxy S5?

Digging further into Samsung’s development records, you’ll find a device called the Samsung KQ LTE. What’s so interesting about this handset is not only does it include a QHD display, but one of the versions also comes with a new Exynos 5430 SoC and Intel’s XMM7260 LTE modem.
You might recall that the Exynos 5430 has appeared a couple of times before, usually whenever talk turns to the rumored Galaxy S5 Prime, although development still looks to be ongoing. Whilst Qualcomm includes an integrated modem with its high-end Snapdragon SoC’s, Samsung’s Exynos chips do not. This discovery also marks Intel’s first sighting in a high-end mobile device with LTE, and leads one to wonder if Samsung is looking to move away from its dependency on Qualcomm in the future.
Exynos-5260-5422
Looking closer at the Exynos 5430, it appears to be an incremental upgrade to Samsung’s octa-core Exynos 5422 chip which was unveiled earlier this year. Compared with the current line-up of Exynos powered products, the 5422 and 5430 offer true Heterogeneous Multi Processing, so all eight cores will be able to run at once. The Samsung KQ targets a slightly higher 2.1 GHz clock speed on the Cortex A15 cores and 1.5 GHz for the A7s. The biggest increase in power comes in the GPU department, where clock speeds jump up to 600MHz, from 533MHz in the 5420 and 5422, although obviously all this could change. Other improvements include a HEVC hardware decoder for the first time, which will help with higher quality video codecs, and a dedicated Cortex A5 co-processor designed to take on audio encode and decode workloads. We’ll have to wait and see if this chip ever lands in western markets, or if it’s destined solely for Korea.
Intel-Modem Samsung Galaxy KQ
Although Samsung’s prototypes may never make it to market in exactly these forms, there’s a good chance that these designs and pieces of hardware could eventually make their way into revisions for Samsung’s existing products or into the company’s next generation of flagship smartphones.

Kamis, 24 April 2014

Gawker New Photos Reveal True Purpose of Mysterious Boston Marathon Roof Man | Jalopnik This Is What

Gawker New Photos Reveal True Purpose of Mysterious Boston Marathon Roof Man | Jalopnik This Is What It Looks Like When You Drive Through A Building | Jezebel Your Partner Knows When You're Faking That Orgasm | Kotaku Everything Wrong With The Matrix? This Could Take A While. | Kinja Popular Posts

Related
Best of Kinja

Playboy How the Central Park Five Still Haunt America | The Concourse Spring Beers, Ranked | Shockwaver Bill Nye talks about his debate with Ken Ham… Read…



View the Original article

Jumat, 21 Maret 2014

Microsoft Read A Blogger’s Personal Email And IMs, Court Docs Reveal

Microsoft caught and fired an employee who leaked confidential software to a French blogger. That blogger then published screenshots of Windows 8 to the Internet before Microsoft’s official announcement. The employee also secretly released, without authorization, a tool that could have allowed for the unauthorized activation of copies of Windows, potentially harming Microsoft’s ability to derive revenue from its software products.

The manner in which the leaker was caught was detailed in a suit filed by the U.S. government against the employee. (Microsoft commented on the situation. Its comment is included below.) Included in the report was a note that Microsoft decided it was within its legal authority to tap into the Hotmail account of the external blogger tied to the leaks, and read email and instant messages.

The blogger had emailed Microsoft looking for clarification regarding some of the software that he had received from the internal source. Microsoft connected the blogger’s email address to the publication where the leaks had been published. So the company took a peek.

Was it legal for Microsoft to do so? Microsoft’s Terms of Service allow it to access information in the accounts that are stored on its “Communications Services,” a group of products that may include: “e-mail services, bulletin board services, chat areas, news groups, forums, communities, personal web pages, calendars, photo albums, file cabinets and/or other message or communication facilities designed to enable you to communicate with others.”

The Terms of Service is blunt: “Microsoft reserves the right to review materials posted to the Communication Services and to remove any materials in its sole discretion.” That statement is preceded by a tepid promise of some sort of privacy: “Microsoft has no obligation to monitor the Communication Services.” Here are just a few of things that you are not allowed to use Microsoft services for:

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 1.00.13 PM

While Microsoft is within its legal right to access the emails in question, it is embarrassing for the company: It has spent untold sums attacking Google’s email service for its automatic scanning of email messages in order to better serve ad content against them.

Both Google and Microsoft scan email for viruses, making Microsoft’s contentions in the ‘Scroogled’ campaign tepid at best and asinine at worst. Thus, to have it become known that Microsoft is willing to enter accounts of a blogger — journalist, really — to plug their own hole is tinted with hypocrisy.

Microsoft won’t read your email unless they pretty much want to — then, too bad.

Microsoft provided TechCrunch with a statement regarding the situation and past actions:

During an investigation of an employee we discovered evidence that the employee was providing stolen IP, including code relating to our activation process, to a third party.  In order to protect our customers and the security and integrity of our products, we conducted an investigation over many months with law enforcement agencies in multiple countries.  This included the issuance of a court order for the search of a home relating to evidence of the criminal acts involved.  The investigation repeatedly identified clear evidence that the third party involved intended to sell Microsoft IP and had done so in the past.

As part of the investigation, we took the step of a limited review of this third party’s Microsoft operated accounts.   While Microsoft’s terms of service make clear our permission for this type of review, this happens only in the most exceptional circumstances.  We apply a rigorous process before reviewing such content.  In this case, there was a thorough review by a legal team separate from the investigating team and strong evidence of a criminal act that met a standard comparable to that required to obtain a legal order to search other sites.  In fact, as noted above, such a court order was issued in other aspects of the investigation.

You can decide on the morality for yourself. Here are the pertinent sections of the suit:

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 12.51.46 PM

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 12.52.15 PM

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 12.52.40 PM

IMAGE BY FLICKR USER TODD BISHOP UNDER CC BY 2.0 LICENSE (IMAGE HAS BEEN CROPPED)