Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Maker. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Maker. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 24 April 2014

Google Gets In On Ground Level With Drone Maker Titan Buy

Titan Aerospace, the drone maker Facebook had been in acquisition talks with prior to being bought by Google (as we’ve now confirmed following The WSJ’s initial report), was a name that took many in the industry by surprise. How was it that a company that reportedly has solar-powered drones that can fly at 65,000 feet above sea level for five years without needing to land, did not have more public attention or media coverage? The answer, as it turns out, is that there may not have been too much to actually cover yet, as the company was very young.

For starters, it hasn’t been around long enough to prove that its drones can fly for five years, because the company itself isn’t that old. This is partly why investors were passing on further fundraising, we understand — it was too soon. However, we hear that Titan, though early, was still further along in some regards than other drone makers getting bought, including recent Facebook acquisition Ascenta, which went for $20 million.

Titan’s number, when it comes out, will be much higher than that, we hear, as news that Facebook was sniffing around played a role in terms of negotiations.

Titan had registered just one aircraft with the FAA in 2011 – the remaining small handful have been registered in either 2013 or 2014 – indicating its still-early nature. The team worked out of a nondescript New Mexico house, one source pointed out to us, referencing a Titan employee’s YouTube video titled “walk through of the Titan crew’s new house in new Mexico.”

A number of Titan’s hires are also more junior-level people who believed in founder Maximus (Max) Yaney’s vision. Only around a year ago did the company make its first notable hire worth issuing a press release about, when it brought in CEO Vern Raburn, who previously founded Eclipse Aviation, to run things.

In its early days, Titan bootstrapped itself through a small grant from the state of New Mexico. In this document from the New Mexico Economic Development Department, dated Q2 2013, Titan Aerospace is described as being in the “final stages of R&D” for its solar-powered unmanned vehicles. The company at that time had 12 employees and was working with Technology Ventures Corporation (TVC), a nonprofit foundation by Lockheed Martin that helps companies commercialize technology invented at Sandia National Labs and other New Mexico-based research entities.

According to the report, Titan was working with TVC on an application for a Small Business Innovation Research grant, and it was also meeting with JTIP, an incentive program that pays for on-the-job training to help “fund training for future staff.”

This is an interesting way to go about funding a company which has come up with breakthrough technology – but there’s a reason why Titan may have gone after grants like this, as we alluded to before: Raising from traditional investors was still tough, and Titan wasn’t at the point where it could prove anything about whether or not its ideas would work.

For example, though there are recordings of flights on YouTube, they aren’t demos of what the final product promises. There is this video of a prototype taking flight, but it’s at about 2,000 feet in the air (not 65K) and it’s at a smaller scale than the proposed Solara models. The 2013 proof-of-concept test, which took place in Moriarty, N.M., was the company’s biggest, publicly detailed achievement to date. Titan didn’t have plans to begin production of the Solara 50 aircraft — weighing 400 pounds with a 162-foot wingspan, until mid-2014, it was previously reported.

We hear that Titan will have another milestone to publicize soon, however, following this Google deal.

That above report also pointed out that high-altitude, solar UAVs have been tried in the past, including by Boeing, which had been making progress on its SolarEagle until DARPA funding was cut, and AeroVironment, who developed the Helios prototype for NASA, which failed. Titan believed it could do better.

But patent searches for Titan Aerospace and founder Yaney come up short (even variations like Titan Holdings or Corporation), which is curious. There’s a Titan Aerospace Electronics Division with several non-drone patents, but it appears to be another company pre-dating this Titan.

Titan itself was an interesting entity. A cached version of the Titan website showed that the company used to use the Waldorf Astoria’s NYC address as its New York location. This was because Yaney was based in New York, and at one time had an office there with a small team for Titan.

Titan’s drones were still in the R&D phases when Facebook came knocking. Facebook wanted to accelerate the production of the aircraft, which the company knew would be tricky because, in the development stage, the process is serial, not parallel. But Facebook’s effectively unlimited capital could speed up some things, like production planning or automating equipment purchases. Google could now do the same, under its Project Loon umbrella, or elsewhere –potentially using the tech to augment its work with aerial imagery or having the drones carry atmospheric sensors, notes The WSJ.

Or, in other words, as Google buys Titan, it’s definitely getting in on the ground (ahem) level here.

Additional reporting by Josh Constine

Rabu, 26 Maret 2014

Nokia X Review: Windows Phone Maker Does Low-Cost Android Surprisingly Well

Nokia’s weird foray into Android is the Nokia X, a small, affordable smartphone that uses Google’s mobile OS, painted up as though it were almost a Windows Phone software variant. It’s a strange beast, with a chunky candybar design that blatantly screams ‘Nokia,’ and a price tag aimed at emerging markets. There’s a good chance Microsoft will kill it as soon as it takes over Nokia’s hardware business (now set for April) but in the meantime, does the Nokia X offer users a way to claw back some of the market share they’ve given up to low-cost Android devices?

Basics

  • 4-inch, 800×480 display
  • 3MP rear camera
  • Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 dual-core 1GHz processor
  • 512MB RAM, 4GB on board storage
  • Up to 32GB expandable storage via micro SD
  • 28 days standby battery, 10.5 hours talk time , 4.5 hours web browsing time
  • Price: Roughly $120-140 US off contract
  • Product info page

Pros

  • Light, cheap and effective

Cons

  • Sluggish OS and web navigation

Design

The Nokia X isn’t fancy, but it’s also not a bad-looking device by any means. It resembles many of other Nokia devices, with defined edges and a thicker case, plus a polycarbonate back that’s matte and smooth to the touch. The case manages to feel like a single-piece design despite the fact that the back is removable because the phone itself pops out from the wraparound cover, instead of having just simple back panel that snaps on and off like on similar phones from Samsung.

  1. IMG_9897

  2. IMG_9895

  3. IMG_9894

  4. IMG_9893

  5. IMG_9892

  6. IMG_9891

  7. IMG_9890

The Nokia X comes in a variety of colors, and as Nokia is prone to do, it executes well on the brighter range of the spectrum. The black version I managed to get my hands on is also good looking, though much more understated than its candy-coated cousins.

A weird feature of Nokia’s take on Android is the single capacitive button it uses, which is simply a back command. This is kind of like a Home button, but contextually aware, so that it goes back a screen no matter where you are, with exiting an app being the final step in any chain. Pressing it on the home screen brings up a Windows Phone-like linear list of recently opened apps, too.

The home screen itself takes cues from Windows Phone, with icons arranged in a tile-like multicolored array. The icons can be adjusted and reconfigured, and set to take up either a 2×2 or 1×1 spot in the grid, and there are widgets accessible to the home screen, too, including ones specific to Nokia and standard Android ones built into third-party apps. It’s a different take on Android to be sure, and a far cry from a stock experience, but it’s also a system that I find far preferable to most other OEM UI reconfigurations, including Samsung Touchwiz.

Performance

This phone isn’t the most cracking handset on the block, and if you’re used to a top-end device like the iPhone or latest Galaxy S, you’re going to notice sluggishness, especially when browsing media-rich content and websites, or even a homescreen with a lot of icons. But overall, the experience does alright with limited resources, and never manages to become genuinely frustrating.

In terms of the field of devices against which it competes (those in the $100 range off-contract), it’s much more of a standout, offering more than competent access to Facebook, the native web, Twitter and other Android standbys in a package that’s both slick and affordable.

The dual-sim Nokia X also offers the ability to change easily between networks, and it has tremendous stand-by battery life. You can have the thing idle for weeks at a time and it’ll still be ready to go when you need it, which is a key concern in markets where access to power might not always be possible. If you’re using the cellular network constantly, battery life dips quickly and falls far short of either the iPhone or any other flagship Android device, but for infrequent use, the Nokia X outperforms either.

One more really nice thing about the Nokia X: Notifications on the custom home screen, including a text-based summary. It’s something that’s still missing from stock Android, and it’s a welcome addition to this custom fork.

Bottom Line

The Nokia X is a surprising bit of hardware, if you can put aside top-tier smartphone expectations and take it for what it is. It’s a good take on Android, and one that actually seeks to improve the experience, in addition to acting as a funnel for Microsoft’s line of mobile software and services. It might not be long for this world, but it also certainly doesn’t feel like a last-minute move Nokia made casually to just try a low-cost Android device before ceding its hardware business to Microsoft, either.

Automatic Album Maker Moment.me Launches A New Service For Mobile Event Websites

Apps that help users make sense of their ever-growing photo collections through automatic organization and curation would seem to make sense, and offer a service people need. But over the past year or so, we’ve seen these types of startups fail, pivot or simply stagnate. Everpix is no more, for example. Tracks shifted, launching a new app called Kanvas for photo-editing. Flayvr has yet to see mainstream adoption.

And today, Tel Aviv-based startup Moment.me joins the fray, with a new business that sees it distancing itself from the automatic, social photo album space, with the launch of a new service focused on building mobile websites for events.

These “microsites,” as the company calls them, are meant to serve as online pop-up shops for events, including things like concerts, sporting events, film festivals, and more. Today, information about an event can be found across the web, on the sites belonging to the artist, the band, the promoter, the sports team, the venue itself, and on blogs and social media, Moment.me co-founder Eilon Tirosh explains.

The new microsite creation service essentially repurposes Moment.me’s aggregation technology for this (the team hopes, eventually profitable) new venture, allowing event organizers, bands or teams to quickly launch a mobile website that serves as the hub for everything there is to know about the event in question.

Screen Shot 2014-03-24 at 9.53.10 AM

The idea is to make building the microsite as simple as using any other consumer-facing service, with no coding required. After entering in the event time and location (or pulling in those details from a Facebook page), the service then pulls in the top content from social networks including Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, while also allowing for further customization, like adding maps, details on where to eat or drink nearby, links to ticket or merchandise sales, sharing features, and more. The resulting sites work well on any form factor, whether desktop/laptop, tablet or mobile phone.

While the basic microsite builder will remain free, over time, the company plans to introduce premium features for commercial events that will allow for additional customization or levels of engagement. Moment.me is also in discussions with others in the event industry, like ticketing companies for example, for further integrations.

Screen Shot 2014-03-24 at 9.50.57 AM

Site creation is currently available online, though the company notes it will also be offered within the Moment.me iPhone application.

Moment.me was founded in February 2012 in Tel Aviv by Ronny Elkayam, Eilon Tirosh, and Boaz Adato. It has $1.5 million in seed funding from Blumberg Capital and other private investors.